About RegBench · Closed pilot
Every decision deserves an independent look.
Independent challenge for insurance decisions in an AI world.
Give your compliance, risk, actuarial and audit teams a clear view of what a decision triggered, what experts think, and the evidence behind it.
Your people make the decisions. RegBench provides the independent challenge.
01 / The process
Your decision.
A second perspective.
A record you can follow.
Independent review belongs alongside your control functions. Accountability stays with your organisation.
-
Your people decide.
Underwriting and claim decisions stay with your licensed staff and your own systems. RegBench never makes, recommends or approves them.
Human accountability -
See what the rules say.
RegBench reports which cited rules a decision triggered and keeps a tamper-evident record for your compliance team to review.
Deterministic, cited checks -
Invite independent challenge.
Engage a vetted expert by the hour, or ask a council of their Digital Twins. Each view stands on its own for your team to consider.
Separate advisory views
02 / The people
Experience matters.
So does perspective.
A marketplace of insurance experts: former regulators, market conduct examiners, compliance officers, underwriters and adjusters.
RegBench checks their licences on public registers and shows you what it checked. Experts set their own prices. You choose who reviews your decisions.
Bring your expertise to RegBench03 / The evidence
Make the challenge
part of the record.
Give your control functions something concrete to follow: the recorded facts, the cited checks and the independent views.
- See who decided and what was recorded.
- Keep cited findings distinct from expert commentary.
- Find where AI-influenced decisions and experienced human judgement part ways.
A decision, with its context.
DEMO / REVIEW RECORD
-
Recorded facts
De-identified input and the decision made by your team.
-
Cited findings
The applicable checks, their sources and their scope.
-
Independent views
Expert commentary, kept separate from the findings.
-
Human review
Your organisation’s response and responsibility.
04 / Clear boundaries
Independent challenge.
Human responsibility.
Useful evidence starts with knowing exactly what a service does—and where its role ends.
- Your decisions stay yours.
- RegBench does not make, recommend or approve decisions, or certify compliance. “No cited rule triggered” means only that.
- Advisory means advisory.
- RegBench does not give legal advice or act as an insurer, producer, adjuster or utilization review agent. Digital Twins cannot comment where state law restricts AI in the decision.
- De-identified facts only.
- Do not submit consumer personal or health information. RegBench takes no health line.
- For your internal teams.
- RegBench does not show results to your applicants, policyholders or claimants. Your organisation remains responsible. No regulatory or agency endorsement is implied.
05 / Start a conversation
Let’s look at what
your team needs to see.
RegBench is in a closed pilot for insurers, MGAs and third party administrators. Start with a one-on-one conversation about your control functions and where independent challenge could fit.
Email [email protected]. Access is by invitation; a conversation does not connect a live decision feed. Please keep examples synthetic.
RegBench reports which cited rules a decision triggered and what independent experts think of it. It does not make, recommend or approve decisions, certify compliance, or give legal advice. Your organisation decides and remains responsible. No regulatory or agency endorsement is implied.